Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Peter Sloterdijk’s General Ascetology.Amir Ahmadi - 2017 - Critical Horizons 18 (4):333-346.
    Peter Sloterdijk maintains that modern institutions and their fundamental ethos, namely self-discipline, training and the orientation to achievement, can be traced back to spiritual self-mastery and ancient ascetic models, exemplified in Christian monastic life. This article examines the bases of this claim and argues that Sloterdijk’s theory empties ascetic formations of their concrete content and removes them from their historical context. The ambition to derive the main features of modern society from a single matrix necessarily produces abstractions and self-serving definitions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Sexual desire, gender equality and radical free-thinking: Theophrastus redivivus(1659) as a proto-feminist text.Gianni Paganini - 2021 - Intellectual History Review 31 (1):27-49.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Unitarian materialism. Christoph Stegmann, Joseph Priestley, and their concepts of matter and soul.Sascha Salatowsky - 2020 - Intellectual History Review 30 (1):7-29.
    This paper describes the affinities between Socinian and Unitarian materialism. Based on different philosophical traditions, the Socinian Christoph Stegmann and the Unitarian Joseph Priestley developed a strong “system of materialism” which fit very well with Christian doctrines and the Bible. The conviction that the whole man is material and therefore mortal became the common basis for these radical thinkers. Stegmann formulated within the Aristotelian tradition a “non-reductive” materialism in which matter, not form, became the fundamental principle of all living things. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From the Devil to the impostor: theological contributions to the idea of imposture.Sascha Salatowsky - 2018 - Intellectual History Review 28 (1):61-78.
    The philosophical allegation of imposture levelled by the Radical Enlightenment at Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad – the three founders of the monotheistic religions – has a complex theological history. Strange as it may sound, it is an idea closely connected to some of the “dangerous” debates conducted by scholastic theologians. Some of these theologians described divine omnipotence in a manner that prompted the vexed question of whether God can deceive us. Of course, no theologian doubted that God could and yet (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark