Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Decoherence and the Copenhagen cut.Scott Tanona - 2013 - Synthese 190 (16):3625-3649.
    While it is widely agreed that decoherence will not solve the measurement problem, decoherence has been used to explain the “emergence of classicality” and to eliminate the need for a Copenhagen edict that some systems simply have to be treated as classical via a quantum-classical “cut”. I argue that decoherence still relies on such a cut. Decoherence accounts derive classicality only in virtue of their incompleteness, by omission of part of the entangled system of which the classical-appearing subsystem is a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On EPR-Type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully et al. I. The Micromaser Case and Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasure.F. Herbut - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (11):1046-1064.
    Delayed-choice erasure is investigated in two-photon two-slit experiments that are generalizations of the micromaser experiment of Scully et al. (Nature 351:111–116, 1991). Applying quantum mechanics to the localization detector, it is shown that erasure with delayed choice in the sense of Scully, has an analogous structure as simple erasure. The description goes beyond probabilities. The EPR-type disentanglement, consisting in two mutually incompatible distant measurements, is used as a general framework in both parts of this study. Two simple coherence cases are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations