Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Plausibility and Evidence: The Case of Homeopathy. [REVIEW]Lex Rutten, Robert T. Mathie, Peter Fisher, Maria Goossens & Michel Wassenhoven - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):525-532.
    Homeopathy is controversial and hotly debated. The conclusions of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials of homeopathy vary from ‘comparable to conventional medicine’ to ‘no evidence of effects beyond placebo’. It is claimed that homeopathy conflicts with scientific laws and that homoeopaths reject the naturalistic outlook, but no evidence has been cited. We are homeopathic physicians and researchers who do not reject the scientific outlook; we believe that examination of the prior beliefs underlying this enduring stand-off can advance the debate. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Virtue, Progress and Practice.Michael Loughlin, Robyn Bluhm, Stephen Buetow, Ross E. G. Upshur, Maya J. Goldenberg, Kirstin Borgerson & Vikki Entwistle - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):839-846.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Philosophy, Ethics, Medicine and Health Care: The Urgent Need for Critical Practice.Michael Loughlin, Ross E. G. Upshur, Maya J. Goldenberg, Robyn Bluhm & Kirstin Borgerson - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):249-259.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Plausibility and Evidence: The Case of Homeopathy. [REVIEW]Lex Rutten, Robert T. Mathie, Peter Fisher, Maria Goossens & Michel van Wassenhoven - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):525-532.
    Homeopathy is controversial and hotly debated. The conclusions of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials of homeopathy vary from ‘comparable to conventional medicine’ to ‘no evidence of effects beyond placebo’. It is claimed that homeopathy conflicts with scientific laws and that homoeopaths reject the naturalistic outlook, but no evidence has been cited. We are homeopathic physicians and researchers who do not reject the scientific outlook; we believe that examination of the prior beliefs underlying this enduring stand-off can advance the debate. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Taking Procrustes' Axe to Professor Fisher's Response.Donald Stanley & Scott Sehon - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):1009-1010.
    Homeopathic medications are used by millions, and hundreds of millions of dollars are spent on these remedies in the USA alone. In the UK, the NHS covers homeopathic treatments. Nonetheless, homeopathy is held in considerable disrepute by much of the medical and scientific community.Many proponents of homeopathy are well aware of these criticisms but remain unimpressed. The differences of opinion run deep, and the debate seems deadlocked. We aim to shed some light on this situation. We briefly recap some of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations