Switch to: References

Citations of:

The word made self: Russian writings on language, 1860-1930

Ithaca: Cornell University Press (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. How Ideas Come Into Being: Tracing Intertextual Moments in Grades of Objectification and Publicness.Andrea Karsten & Marie-Cécile Bertau - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:458438.
    How do ideas come into being? Our contribution takes its starting point in an observation we made in empirical data from a prior study. The data center around an instant of an academic writer’s thinking during the revision of a scientific paper. Through a detailed discourse-oriented micro-analysis, we zoom in on the writer’s thinking activity and uncover the genesis of a complex idea through a sequence of interrelated moments. These moments feature different degrees of “crystallization” of the idea; from gestures, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Gustav Shpet and the Semiotics of 'Living Discourse'.Philip T. Grier - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (1):61-68.
    Semioticians traditionally honor Russian linguistics of the early 20th century, and study Jakobson, Vinogradov, Vinokur or the early Trubetzkoy. They do, however, seldom consider Russian philosophers of the same period. Gustav Shpet is an important representative of Russian philosophers in discussion with Hegel, Neo-Kantian thinkers and contemporaries in Russia and abroad, among them Edmund Husserl, originator of transcendental phenomenology. Shpet introduced Husserl’s phenomenology in Russia and expanded those ideas in his 1914 Appearance and Sense. A triangle “Hegel—Husserl—semiotics” emerged where Shpet (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation