Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What’s Wrong with Social Hierarchy? On Niko Kolodny’s The Pecking Order.Daniel Sharp - 2023 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 27 (1):129-137.
    This review critically assesses Niko Kolodny’s theory of social hierarchy and its importance as articulated in _The Pecking Order_ ( 2023 ). After summarizing Kolodny’s argument, I raise two critical challenges. First, I ask whether Kolodny leaves us without adequate account of why social hierarchies are, in themselves, objectionable. Second, I query whether Kolodny’s defense of representative democracy is decisive, and suggest that egalitarians should be open to alternative ways of mitigating the threat of hierarchy posed by political rule.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Immigration, Naturalization, and the Purpose of Citizenship.Daniel Sharp - 2022 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (2):408-441.
    It is widely believed that immigrants, after some time, acquire a claim to naturalize and become citizens of their new state. What explains this claim? Although existing answers (may) succeed in justifying some of immigrants' rights claims, they cannot justify the claim that immigrants are owed the opportunity to naturalize because these theories lack a sufficiently rich account of the purpose of citizenship. To fill this gap, I offer a novel egalitarian account of citizenship. Citizenship, on this account, partially protects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Domestic Mobility and Relational Equality.Patti Tamara Lenard - forthcoming - Moral Philosophy and Politics.
    My focus is on how democratic states restrict, constrain and shape the movement of citizens and residents across their territory. My central claim is that a focus on equal relations between them, as relational egalitarians emphasize, can show where restrictions on movement are permissible or problematic. Over the course of the discussion, I offer many examples, as well as four cases in which I assess specific movement-related policies for whether they are violations of relational equality: exclusionary zoning, eminent domain, resettlement (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cooperation, Democracy, and Coercion: On the Grounds and Scope of Freedom of Movement.Borja Niño Arnaiz - forthcoming - Moral Philosophy and Politics.
    It is often believed that domestic principles of justice cannot ground freedom of international movement. Some argue that since principles of justice are not global in scope, justice does not require freedom of movement at the global level. This is problematic, for it confuses the grounds with the scope of justice. Given that the scope of justice is potentially global, freedom of movement must also be global in scope. Others have argued that the grounds of freedom of movement themselves are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark