Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Hydra‐Logical Approach: Acknowledging Complexity in the Study of Religion, Science, and Technology.Robert M. Geraci - 2020 - Zygon 55 (4):948-970.
    Scholarship has grown increasingly nuanced in its grappling with the intersections of religion, science, and technology but requires a new paradigm. Contemporary approaches to specific technologies reveal a wide variety of perspectives but remain too often committed to typological classification. To be vigilant of our obligation to understand and reveal, scholars in the study of religion, science, and technology can adopt a hydra‐logical stance: we can recognize that there are cultural monsters possessing scientific, technological, and religious heads. These heads may (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Arguing from the Evidence.Brian A. Thomasson - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):495-534.
    In Kitzmiller v. Dover (2005), the only U.S. federal case on teaching Intelligent Design in public schools, the plaintiffs used the same argument as in the creation-science trials of the 1980s: Intelligent Design is religion, not science, because it invokes the supernatural; thus teaching it violates the Constitution. Although the plaintiffs won, this strategy is unwise because it is based on problematic definitions of religion and science, leads to multiple truths in society, and is unlikely to succeed before the present (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation