Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The unnoticed monism of Judith Shklar’s liberalism of fear.Allyn Fives - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (1):45-63.
    Judith Shklar’s liberalism of fear, a political and philosophical standpoint that emerges in her mature work, has ostensibly two defining characteristics. It is a sceptical approach that puts cruelty first among the vices. For that reason, it is considered to be both set apart from mainstream liberalism, in particular the liberalism of J. S. Mill and John Rawls, but also an important source of influence for political realists and nonideal theorists. However, I argue here that, in putting cruelty first among (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The knowledge of suffering: On Judith Shklar|[rsquo]|s |[lsquo]|Putting Cruelty First|[rsquo]|.Kamila Stullerova - 2014 - Contemporary Political Theory 13 (1):23.
    Judith Shklar’s dictum, ‘the worst evil of cruelty’, is well known. What this means for her political theory and how such theory is construed are rarely explored. This article maintains that Shklar’s turn towards cruelty/suffering has a specific role in the development of her political argument. It allows her both to curb her long-standing skepticism, and to use it creatively. This is because suffering must be examined from the perspectives of history and philosophy, which produce two sets of knowledge, each (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Ideological Struggle as Agonistic Conflict (Anti)Hypocrisy, Free Speech and Critical Social Justice.Christof Royer - 2021 - Jus Cogens 3 (3):257-278.
    This article addresses two questions: How should a ‘practical political theory’ approach the ideological struggle between advocates of critical social justice and defenders of free speech? And, what does this conflict tell us about the deficits of one particular tradition of practical political theory — namely, agonistic democracy? The paper’s purpose, then, is to illuminate a concrete contemporary phenomenon through the lens of agonistic theory and, conversely, to use this struggle as an impetus to carve out and address weaknesses in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The meaning of exile: Judith N. Shklar’s maieutic discourse.Andreas Hess - 2018 - European Journal of Social Theory 21 (3):288-303.
    This article discusses why the theme of exile, marginality and the role of outsiders occupied Judith N. Shklar and how it impacted on her teaching and writing. More specifically it draws on Shklar’s last Harvard lectures and essays in which she reflects systematically on the questions of obligation and exile. It maintains that the relatively late turn towards exile is neither accident nor retrospective construction. Throughout her adult life Judith Shklar argued from a position of ‘optimal marginality’ – what has (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Liberalism for the twenty-first century: The skeptical radicalism of Judith Shklar.Christof Royer - 2020 - Contemporary Political Theory 19 (1):67-70.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Judith N. Shklar on disobedience and obligation in a “society of strangers”.Rieke Trimcev - 2022 - Constellations 29 (1):65-79.
    Constellations, Volume 29, Issue 1, Page 65-79, March 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark