Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Regulating Offense, Nurturing Offense.Robert Mark Simpson - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (3):235-256.
    Joel Feinberg’s Offense to Others is the most comprehensive contemporary work on the significance of offense in a liberal legal system. Feinberg argues that being offended can impair a person’s liberty, much like a nuisance, and that it is therefore legitimate in principle to regulate conduct because of its offensiveness. In this article, I discuss some overlooked considerations that give us reason to resist Feinberg’s conclusion, even while granting this premise. My key claim is that the regulation of offense can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Profound offense and cultural appropriation.James O. Young - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):135–146.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • (1 other version)Disgust, Dignity, and a Public Intellectual. [REVIEW]Judith André - 2005 - Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):52-57.
    Martha Nussbaum’s Hiding from Humanity is eloquent and thought-provoking. I criticize some of her central arguments, particularly her construal of disgust and her exposition of shame. But I applaud the book as a whole. It is possible that richness and engagement are more important in the work of public intellectuals than is technical precision. If so, Nussbaum has fulfilled her role. It is more likely that both qualities are important, but difficult to combine. In that case, we can still thank (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Review essay / disgust, dignity, and a public intellectual.Judith André - 2005 - Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):52-57.
    Martha C. Nussbaum, Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton Nf: Princeton University Press, 2004, xv #;pl 413 pp.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the (in)tolerance of hate speech: does it have legitimacy in a democracy?Nuraan Davids - 2018 - Ethics and Education 13 (3):296-308.
    In May 2017, yet another South African university became a site of hate speech. Three students chose to display Nazi-inspired posters, which advertised an ‘Anglo-Afrikaner student’ event, under the motto ‘Fight for Stellenbosch’. That the posters provoked the response which it so obviously sought, was evident in the student outrage, and the swift condemnation from university management. Neither the prevalence of hate speech, nor its predictable responses, is new. The central concern of this article is to consider the extent to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation