Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Critical Factors to Achieve Sustainability of Public-Private Partnership Projects in the Water Sector: A Stakeholder-Oriented Network Perspective.Nan He, Yijing Li, Huimin Li, Ziqi Liu & Chengyi Zhang - 2020 - Complexity 2020:1-17.
    A key challenge in the management of the public-private partnership project is to understand the critical factors for sustainability performance as well as their complex interaction. Majority of existing studies focus on identifying general factors without consideration of specific context of individual sector. To bridge the gap, unique characteristics of water PPP projects are taken into consideration in this study where the relationship among critical factors to achieve sustainable performance is analyzed from a network perspective. Stakeholder-associated factors and their interrelations (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Not Defining Sustainability.Jeffry L. Ramsey - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6):1075-1087.
    Definitions of sustainability—and criticisms of the definitions—abound. I argue that there are problems with the definitional approach itself and not just with any specific definition. Wittgenstein. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1958) argued that definitions are not sufficient to determine meaning or to legislate correct usage of words. For both singular terms and general concepts, meaning is meaning-as-use, proceeding via examples that instruct within an already existing normative structure. Once we are clear on the ways in which use presupposes a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • De-Facto Science Policy in the Making: How Scientists Shape Science Policy and Why it Matters (or, Why STS and STP Scholars Should Socialize).Thaddeus R. Miller & Mark W. Neff - 2013 - Minerva 51 (3):295-315.
    Science and technology (S&T) policy studies has explored the relationship between the structure of scientific research and the attainment of desired outcomes. Due to the difficulty of measuring them directly, S&T policy scholars have traditionally equated “outcomes” with several proxies for evaluation, including economic impact, and academic output such as papers published and citations received. More recently, scholars have evaluated science policies through the lens of Public Value Mapping, which assesses scientific programs against societal values. Missing from these approaches is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Lessons from the Sustainability Movement: Toward An Integrative Decision-Making Framework for Nanotechnology.Mark E. Meaney - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):682-688.
    The author argues that bioethicists must develop alternative approaches to facilitate the study of the conditions for the responsible development of nanotechnologies. Proponents of “sustainability” have developed a useful model to integrate multiple perspectives into the evaluation of the impact of technologies on global ecological integrity under conditions of uncertainty.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Lessons from the Sustainability Movement: Toward An Integrative Decision-Making Framework for Nanotechnology.Mark E. Meaney - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (4):682-688.
    Like biotechnology before it, nanotechnology is beginning to provoke opposition from environmentalists concerned about the ethics of the development and application of nanotechnologies. Given the lack of data on environmental health and safety regarding how nanoparticles might impact the environment and effect the health of the human body, some environmentalists have called for limits on the production of nanoproducts until more research can be done to prove their safety. On the other side, while nanotech scientists and engineers agree that additional (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • New Modernities: Reimagining Science, Technology and Development.Sheila Jasanoff - 2002 - Environmental Values 11 (3):253-276.
    'Development' operates as an allegedly value-neutral concept in the policy world. This essay describes four mechanisms that have helped to strip development of its subjective and meaning-laden elements: persistent misreading of technology as simply material and inanimate; uncritical acceptance of models, including economic ones, as adequate representations of complex systems; failure to recognize routine practices as repositories of power; and erasing history and time as relevant factors in producing scenarios for the future. Failure to take these elements into account has (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations