Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On Spearman's “problem of correlation”.John B. Carroll - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):7-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Module or muddle?Janet Dean Fodor - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):7-9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Combe's crucible and the music of the modules.John C. Marshall - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):23-24.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Encapsulation and expectation.Roger Schank & Larry Hunter - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):29-30.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Organic insight into mental organs.Barry Schwartz - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):30-31.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The centrality of modules.Howard Gardner - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):12-14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Vertically unparalleled.Ignatius G. Mattingly & Alvin M. Liberman - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):24-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Lexicon as module.Mark S. Seidenberg - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):31-32.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Evidence for and against modularity.Earl Hunt - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):19-20.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Fodor's holism.Clark Glymour - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):15-16.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The modularity of behavior.Peter R. Killeen - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):22-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A modular sense of place?C. R. Gallistel & Ken Cheng - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):11-12.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Parallel processing explains modular informational encapsulation.Marcel Kinsbourne - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):23-23.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Cognitive self-organization and neural modularity.Stephen Grossberg - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):18-19.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The mind as a Necker Cube.Jerome Kagan - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):21-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Controlled versus automatic processing.Robert J. Sternberg - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):32-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A rapprochement of biology, psychology, and philosophy.Sandra Scarr - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):29-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The place of behaviour in psychological experiments.Don Mixon - 1986 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 16 (1):123–137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Psychological conflict and human nature: The case of behaviourism and cognition.Hugh M. Lacey - 1980 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 10 (3):131–156.
    A reasonable choice between Skinner's and Chomsky's theories requires reference to a conception of human nature. It is explained in detail why this is so, in the context of an analysis of what it is to ‘choose’ a theory. This account helps to explain the unity and coherence of the science, methodology, conception of science, object of scientific inquiry and views towards control of each of Skinner and Chomsky, and thereby explains the chasm which separates the parties to their respective (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The scientific study of lingustic behaviour: A perspective on the Skinner-Chomsky controversy.Hugh M. Lacey - 1974 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 4 (1):17–51.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Precis of the modularity of mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):1-42.
    The Modularity of Mind proposes an alternative to the or view of cognitive architecture that has dominated several decades of cognitive science. Whereas interactionism stresses the continuity of perceptual and cognitive processes, modularity theory argues for their distinctness. It is argued, in particular, that the apparent plausibility of New Look theorizing derives from the failure to distinguish between the (correct) claim that perceptual processes are inferential and the (dubious) claim that they are unencapsidated, that is, that they are arbitrarily sensitive (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   277 citations  
  • The Behaviorisms of Skinner and Quine: Genesis, Development, and Mutual Influence.Sander Verhaegh - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (4):707-730.
    in april 1933, two bright young Ph.D.s were elected to the Harvard Society of Fellows: the psychologist B. F. Skinner and the philosopher/logician W. V. Quine. Both men would become among the most influential scholars of their time; Skinner leads the "Top 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th Century," whereas philosophers have selected Quine as the most important Anglophone philosopher after the Second World War.1 At the height of their fame, Skinner and Quine became "Edgar Pierce twins"; the latter (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Too little and latent.John Morton - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):26-27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Quinity, isotropy, and Wagnerian rapture.Georges Rey - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):27-28.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (9 other versions)Reply module.Jerry A. Fodor - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):33-42.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   30 citations  
  • (1 other version)Equivocal Alliances of Phenomenological Psychologists.P. D. Ashworth - 1981 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 12 (1):1-31.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Radykalny behawioryzm jako filozofia nauki.Natalia Marek - 2011 - Semina Scientiarum 10:78-91.
    A common problem appearing in the discussions is connecting behaviorism with positivism. The main goal of this article is to show that this alliance is not legitimate – main principles of the Skinnerian science rather point to the Mach’s empiricism, pragmatism and operationalism than to Carnap’s project. Secondly it will be shown that behaviorism is most importantly the philosophy of science. In the last part we will consider the main points appearing in the critique of behaviorism and try to give (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A neo-Cartesian alternative.David Caplan - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):6-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What constitutes a module?Peter W. Jusczyk & Asher Cohen - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):20-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Skinnerism: Materialism Minus the dialectic.Elliot G. Mishler - 1976 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6 (1):21–48.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Faculties, modules, and computers.Daniel N. Robinson - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):28-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Special purpose computation: All is not one.K. I. Forster - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):9-11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Science without reduction.Helmut F. Spinner - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):16 – 94.
    The aim of this essay is a criticism of reductionism ? both in its ?static? interpretation (usually referred to as the layer model or level?picture of science) and in its ?dynamic? interpretation (as a theory of the growth of scientific knowledge), with emphasis on the latter ? from the point of view of Popperian fallibilism and Feyerabendian pluralism, but without being committed to the idiosyncrasies of these standpoints. In both aspects of criticism, the rejection is based on the proposal of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • A biosemiotics perspective on dogs’ interaction with interfaces.Clara Mancini - 2023 - Interaction Studies 24 (2):201-224.
    Understanding how animals might make sense of the interfaces they interact with is important to inform the design of animal-centered interactions. In this regard, biosemiotics provides a useful lens through which to examine animals’ interactions with interfaces and the sensemaking mechanisms that might underpin such interactions. This paper leverages Uexküll’s Umwelt theory, Peirce’s logic of sign relations and Gibson’s theory of affordances to analyze examples of dogs’ interactions with interfaces, particularly the role of the semiotic mechanisms of indexicality and isomorphism. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On Gall's reputation and some recent “new phrenology”.C. G. Gross - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):16-18.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Explanation, teleology, and operant behaviorism.Jon D. Ringen - 1976 - Philosophy of Science 43 (June):223-253.
    B. F. Skinner's claim that "operant behavior is essentially the field of purpose" is systematically explored. It is argued that Charles Taylor's illuminating analysis of the explanatory significance of common-sense goal-ascriptions (1) lends some (fairly restricted) support to Skinner's claim, (2) considerably clarifies the conceptual significance of differences between operant and respondent behavior and conditioning, and (3) undercuts influential assertions (e.g., Taylor's) that research programs for behavioristic psychology share a "mechanistic" orientation. A strategy is suggested for assessing the plausibility of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Reflex theory, cautionary tale: misleading simplicity in early neuroscience.M. Chirimuuta - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):12731-12751.
    This paper takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach to the topic of "simplicity out of complexity". The reflex theory was a framework within early twentieth century psychology and neuroscience which aimed to decompose complex behaviours and neural responses into simple reflexes. It was controversial in its time, and did not live up to its own theoretical and empirical ambitions. Examination of this episode poses important questions about the limitations of simplifying strategies, and the relationship between simplification and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Modularity: Contextual interactions and the tractability of nonmodular systems.Sam Glucksberg - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (1):14-15.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Alienated Psychologist.Elisabeth P. Brandt & Lewis W. Brandt - 1974 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 5 (1):41-52.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Comments on "Intentional Behaviorism" by G. R. Foxall.J. Moore - 2007 - Behavior and Philosophy 35:113 - 130.
    Professor Foxall suggests the radical behaviorist language of contingencies is fine as far as it goes, and is quite suitable for matters of prediction and control. However, he argues that radical behaviorist language is extensional, and that it is necessary to formally incorporate the intentional idiom into the language of behavioral science to promote explanations and interpretations of behavior that are comprehensive in scope. Notwithstanding Professor Foxall's arguments, radical behaviorists hold that the circumstances identified by the use of the intentional (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Skinner on the prediction and control of behavior.Hugh M. Lacey - 1979 - Theory and Decision 10 (1-4):353-385.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations