Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Pregnant women are often not listened to, but pathologising pregnancy isn’t the solution.Brad Partridge & Taryn Rebecca Knox - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    Smajdor and Rasanen (2024) argue that pregnant women are routinely denied appropriate treatment because pregnancy is seen as normal, and so they are denied ‘patient status’. They claim that formally classifying pregnancy as a disease may lead to better treatment for pregnant women. In this response, we argue that pathologising pregnancy and classifying all pregnant women as ‘diseased patients’ won’t reconfigure care in ways that benefit all women. Rather, it will likely only embolden the view that clinicians are entitled to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Defending the disease view of pregnancy: a reply to our critics.Joona Räsänen & Anna Smajdor - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
    We recently suggested that there are both pragmatic and normative reasons to classify pregnancy as a disease. Several scholars argued against our claims. In this response, we defend the disease view of pregnancy against their criticism. We claim that the dysfunctional account of disease that some of our critics rely on has some counterintuitive results. Furthermore, we claim that our critics assume what needs to be argued that the primary function of our sexual organs is to reproduce. Since only a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reconsidering the utilitarian link between veganism and antinatalism.Joona Räsänen - 2024 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 45 (4):321-323.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations