Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Taking theology and science seriously without category mistakes: A response to Ian Barbour.Taede A. Smedes - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):271-276.
    . In my response to Ian Barbour's criticisms, I first argue for the anthropological dimensions and contextuality of any theology. Next I examine and criticize Barbour's thesis that I am an in‐compatibilist about divine action. Finally I illustrate the fact that I see genuine opportunities for a dialogue between theologians and scientists without apologetics, category mistakes, or relegating theology to the fringes of science, by pointing to evolutionary explanations of religion.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A biologist's perspective on the future of the science-religion dialogue in the twenty-first century.I. V. Carvalho - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):217-226.
    Abstract.In recent issues of Zygon, numerous reflections have been published commenting on where the field of science‐and‐religion has been, where it presently stands, and where it should move in the future. These reflections touch on the importance of the dialogue and raise questions as to what audience the dialogue addresses and whom it should address. Some scholars see the dialogue as prospering, while others point out that much work needs to be done to make the dialogue more accessible to a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Is there a future for the dialogue?Sjoerd L. Bonting - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):227-234.
    Abstract.The title question was raised by Philip Hefner in an editorial in the March 2007 issue of Zygon, and answered in various ways in sixteen guest editorials in the June, September, and December 2007 issues. In this article, after defining some pertinent concepts, I comment on these essays. I review critical statements made by the guest editorialists and survey their proposals for further dialogue topics. I conclude with my own views on the future of the dialogue and the role of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A biologist's Perspective on the Future of the Science‐Religion Dialogue in the Twenty‐First Century.John J. Carvalho - 2008 - Zygon 43 (1):217-226.
    Abstract.In recent issues of Zygon, numerous reflections have been published commenting on where the field of science‐and‐religion has been, where it presently stands, and where it should move in the future. These reflections touch on the importance of the dialogue and raise questions as to what audience the dialogue addresses and whom it should address. Some scholars see the dialogue as prospering, while others point out that much work needs to be done to make the dialogue more accessible to a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On the road with religion-and-science and the romance of the past.Lea F. Schweitz - 2010 - Zygon 45 (2):443-447.
    This essay responds to the question "Where Are We Going? Zygon and the Future of Religion-and-Science" and was first presented on 9 May 2009 at a symposium honoring Philip Hefner's editorship of Zygon. It offers four suggestions for the future of religion-and-science: Ask big questions; encourage cultural literacy in the public sphere; bring a critical voice to other academic disciplines; and include the history of philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • “Landscape Plotted and Pieced”: Exploring the Contours of Engagement Between (Neuro)Science and Theology.Pat Bennett - 2019 - Zygon 54 (1):86-106.
    This article—the first of a linked set of three outlining the development and practice of a different approach to science/religion dialogue—begins with an overview of some persistent tensions in the field. Then, using a threefold heuristic of encounter, engagement, and expression, it explores the routes taken by James Ashbrook and Andrew Newberg to develop a dialogue between theology and neuroscience, discussing some of the problems associated with these and their implications for attempts to further develop neurotheology. Finally, it proposes a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations