Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Aspirational solidarity as bioethical norm: The case of reproductive justice.Alexis Shotwell - 2013 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 6 (1):103-120.
    In this paper, I attend to a current strand in bioethics that forwards solidarity as a promising direction for bioethics theory and health-promoting practices. Drawing on resources from social and political philosophy, I argue that we can gain useful insight in bioethics if we understand solidarity as a political relation grounded not on shared social location but rather on shared visions for the sorts of worlds in which collective health and dignity proliferate. I consider what traction this conception of solidarity (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: A Canon for the Ages?G. Trotter - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):195-203.
    The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights of 2005 purports to articulate universal norms for bioethics. However, this document has met with mixed reviews. Some deny that the elaboration of universal bioethics norms is needed; some deny that UNESCO has the expertise or authority to articulate such norms; some regard the content of the UNESCO document as too vague or general to be useful; and some regard the document as a cog in the effort of like-minded cosmopolitans to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • In defence of Helsinki and human rights.A. Plomer - 2012 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 5 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Biotechnologies and Human Dignity.Joseph Masciulli & William Sweet - 2011 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 31 (1):6-16.
    In this article, the authors review some contemporary cases where biotechnologies have been employed, where they have had global implications, and where there has been considerable debate. The authors argue that the concept of dignity, which lies at the center of such documents as the 2005 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data (2003) and the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights (1997) is useful, if not necessary, in engaging in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations