Switch to: References

Citations of:

Fact, Fiction, and Fitness

Journal of Philosophy 81 (7):372-383 (1984)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Towards a characterization of metaphysics of biology: metaphysics for and metaphysics in biology.Vanesa Triviño - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-21.
    Since the last decades of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first century, the use of metaphysics by philosophers when approaching conceptual problems in biology has increased. Some philosophers call this tendency in philosophy of biology ‘Metaphysics of Biology’. In this paper, I aim at characterizing Metaphysics of Biology by paying attention to the diverse ways philosophers use metaphysics when addressing conceptual problems in biology. I will claim that there are two different modes of doing Metaphysics of Biology, namely (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Interaction of Theories and the semantic Conception of Evolutionary Theory.Paul Thompson - 1986 - Philosophica 37.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Ignorance and disinformation in the philosophy of biology: A reply to STENT. [REVIEW]Alexander Rosenberg - 1986 - Biology and Philosophy 1 (4):461-471.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • What Sort of Science Is Evolutionary Biology?Mohan Matthen - 1991 - Dialogue 30 (1-2):129-.
    A review of Paul Thompson's semantic interpretation of evolutionary theory.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The misuse of Sober's selection for/selection of distinction.R. Goode & P. E. Griffiths - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (1):99-108.
    Elliott Sober''s selection for/selection of distinction has been widely used to clarify the idea that some properties of organisms are side-effects of selection processes. It has also been used, however, to choose between different descriptions of an evolutionary product when assigning biological functions to that product. We suggest that there is a characteristic error in these uses of the distinction. Complementary descriptions of function are misrepresented as mutually excluding one another. This error arises from a failure to appreciate that selection (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations