Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Scientific Biography, Cognitive Deficits, and Laboratory Practice: James McKeen Cattell and Early American Experimental Psychology, 1880–1904.Michael M. Sokal - 2010 - Isis 101 (3):531-554.
    ABSTRACT Despite widespread interest in individual life histories, few biographies of scientists make use of insights derived from psychology, another discipline that studies people, their thoughts, and their actions. This essay argues that recent theoretical work in psychology and tools developed for clinical psychological practice can help biographical historians of science create and present fuller portraits of their subjects' characters and temperaments and more nuanced analyses of how these traits helped shape their subjects' scientific work. To illustrate this thesis, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mind and knowledge in the early thought of Franz Boas, 1887–1904.Valentina Mann - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (5):157-184.
    Franz Boas’ articulation of a new historicist and relativistic framework for anthropology stands as the founding moment of the discipline. Accordingly, scholars have sought to trace its source and inspirations, often concluding that Boas’ thought was shaped almost exclusively by his German background and characterized by a foundational methodological tension. Here, I instead show that Boas’ most creative early work benefitted from close interaction with debates in psychology and that his methodological reflections were part of the much wider series of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Psychical Research in the Psychological Review, 1894–1900: A Bibliographical Note.Carlos S. Alvarado - 2010 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 23 (2).
    While there was much conflict during the 19th century between psychology and psychical research, the latter was occasionally discussed in psychology journals. The purpose of this paper is to provide a guide to existing discussions of psychical research and related topics in the American journal Psychological Review. Many of the discussions were authored by individuals favorably disposed to psychical research, such as William James and James H. Hyslop, but also by such skeptics as James McKeen Cattell and Joseph Jastrow. With (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations