Switch to: References

Citations of:

Commentary

Southern Journal of Philosophy 33 (Supplement):161-170 (1995)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Epistemicism and Nihilism about Vagueness: What’s the Difference?David Enoch - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):285-311.
    In this paper I argue, first, that the only difference between Epistemicism and Nihilism about vagueness is semantic rather than ontological, and second, that once it is clear what the difference between these views is, Nihilism is a much more plausible view of vagueness than Epistemicism. Given the current popularity of certain epistemicist views (most notably, Williamson’s), this result is, I think, of interest.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Wright on the epistemic conception of vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1996 - Analysis 56 (1):39-45.
    According to the epistemic conception of vagueness defended in Williamson 1994, what we use vague terms to say is true or false, but in borderline cases we cannot know which. Our grasp of what we say does not open its truth-value to our view. Crispin Wright 1995 offers a lively critique of this conception. A reply may help to clarify the issues.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations