Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Limits of Traditional Approaches to Informed Consent for Genomic Medicine.Thomas May, Kaija L. Zusevics, Arthur Derse, Kimberly A. Strong, Jessica Jeruzal, Alison La Pean Kirschner, Michael H. Farrell & Ryan Spellecy - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (3):185-202.
    This paper argues that it will be important for new genomic technologies to recognize the limits of traditional approaches to informed consent, so that other-regarding implications of genomic information can be properly contextualized and individual rights respected. Respect for individual autonomy will increasingly require dynamic consideration of the interrelated dimensions of individual and broader community interests, so that the interests of one do not undermine fundamental interests of the other. In this, protection of individual rights will be a complex interplay (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Rethinking Clinical Risk for DNA Sequencing.Thomas May - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):24-26.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 10, Page 24-26, October 2012.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Blurring Boundaries.Niels Nijsingh - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):26-27.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 10, Page 26-27, October 2012.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Facilitating Autonomy With Broad Consent.Ryan Spellecy - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):43-44.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On the Justifiability of ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing.Thomas May - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (1):134-142.
    This paper examines three possible justifications for original ACMG recommendations to return incidental findings from whole exome or genome sequencing independent of patient preferences. The first two potential justifications, based on a patient's authentic values, then on harms to others, are founding lacking as a basis of justification for these recommendations. The third, grounded in analogous professional practices, might serve as a potential justification if several controversies can be avoided. However, given the nature of these controversies and the need to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations