Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Editors’ Introduction and Review: Sociolinguistic Variation and Cognitive Science.Jean-Pierre Chevrot, Katie Drager & Paul Foulkes - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (4):679-695.
    Sociolinguists study the interaction between language and society. Variationist sociolinguistics — the subfield of sociolinguistics which is the focus of this issue — uses empirical and quantitative methods to study the production and perception of linguistic variation. Linguistic variation refers to how speakers choose between linguistic forms that say the same thing in different ways, with the variants differing in their social meaning. For example, how frequently someone says fishin’ or fishing depends on a number of factors, such as the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Lexical and Social Effects on the Learning and Integration of Inflectional Morphology.Péter Rácz & Ágnes Lukács - 2024 - Cognitive Science 48 (8):e13483.
    People learn language variation through exposure to linguistic interactions. The way we take part in these interactions is shaped by our lexical representations, the mechanisms of language processing, and the social context. Existing work has looked at how we learn and store variation in the ambient language. How this is mediated by the social context is less understood.We report on the results of an innovative experimental battery designed to test how learning variation is affected by a variable's social indexicality. Hungarian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Missed Connections at the Junction of Sociolinguistics and Speech Processing.Gerard Docherty, Paul Foulkes, Simon Gonzalez & Nathaniel Mitchell - 2018 - Topics in Cognitive Science 10 (4):759-774.
    This paper outlines limitations to integrating social meaning into cognitive models of speech production and processing. The authors remind the reader that acoustic space is not the same as articulatory or auditory space and they point to the benefits of using relatively uncommon dynamic methods of acoustic analysis. Further, the authors argue in favor of a more complex and socially‐informed conception of ‘style’ than is typically used in work on language cognition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation