Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the Legitimate Objectives of Criminalisation.A. P. Simester & Andreas von Hirsch - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):367-379.
    We discuss and respond to the contributions of Tatjana Hörnle, John Kleinig, and John Stanton-Ife, and clarify some aspects of the arguments made in Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Symposium on Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation.Matt Matravers - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):297-299.
    Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch’s Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation (Simester and von Hirsch 2011) is an important contribution to the philosophical debate over the nature and ethical limits of criminalisation. As they note in their reply in this symposium, one of the novel aspects of their account is that they do not advance one “unified, grand theory”. Rather, they analyse each ground of criminal prohibition—wrongfulness, harm-based, offense, and paternalistic prohibitions aimed at preventing self-harm—so as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark