Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Rectification and Historic Injustice.Jason Lee Byas - 2022 - In Matt Zwolinski & Benjamin Ferguson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Libertarianism. Routledge. pp. 427-440.
    This chapter surveys libertarian thought on the question of “historic injustice,” which is when serious injustice goes unresolved for many years. After some historical discussion of early libertarian writing on the subject, I turn to the contemporary debate surrounding reparations for slavery. After outlining three arguments common among libertarians for reparations, common reasons for skepticism are also discussed. Then, special focus is given to the topic of land theft. In particular, I hone in on what I call the “Poisoning Problem,” (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Nine objections to Steiner and Wolff on land disputes.B. Weatherson - 2003 - Analysis 63 (4):321-327.
    Some objections to the idea that disputed territories should be auctioned.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Butler problem revisited.T. Nadelhoffer - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):277-284.
    On the surface, it seems plausible that the goodness or badness of an agent’s actions should be completely irrelevant to the question of whether she performed them intentionally, but there is growing evidence that ascriptions of intentional actions are affected by moral considerations. Joshua Knobe, for instance, has recently published a series of groundbreaking papers (2003a, 2003b, 2004) in which he suggests that people’s judgments concerning the intentionality of an action may sometimes depend on what they think about the action (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  • (1 other version)Disputed land claims: A response to Weatherson and to bou-Habib and Olsaretti.Hillel Steiner & Jonathan Wolff - 2006 - Analysis 66 (3):248–255.
    In a paper published in this journal we proposed a method for resolving disputed land claims between two parties (Steiner and Wolff: 2003). In essence the proposal is to hold an auction between the disputants in which the land is given to the higher bidder, but the receipts of the auction to the under-bidder. We claimed that under such circumstances both parties can walk away happy: the higher bidder happy to pay the price bid for the land; the under-bidder happier (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Land disputes and auctions: A response to Steiner and Wolff.Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):284–287.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation