Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the merits of critical realism and the “ontological turn” in economics: Reply to Steele.Paul A. Lewis - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (1):207-230.
    The discipline of economics can benefit from a more explicit, systematic, and sustained concern with ontology; that is, with the philosophical analysis of the nature of the social world. Contrary to the argument advanced in these pages by Gerry Steele , critical-realist ontological analysis encourages fruitful economic research in a number of ways: by helping to identify research methods suitable for analyzing economic issues; by promoting the development of key substantive economic concepts; and by helping to reveal and resolve inconsistencies (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Critical Realism and the Ontological Turn: Rejoinder to Lewis.G. R. Steele - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (1):231-235.
    I agree with Paul Lewis that mathematics has a valuable but not all-encompassing role in economics, that event regularities must be supplemented with a persuasive narrative, and that inferences can inform our understanding of economic behavior. However, Lewis's full-throated defense of critical realism does little to allay my original concerns. It is absurd to maintain, as critical realists do, that mainstream economics has nothing valuable to offer heterodox economists, as their critique of the quantity theory of money tries to demonstrate. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark