Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Would Armed Humanitarian Intervention Have Been Justified to Protect the Rohingyas?Benjamin D. King - 2020 - Journal of Military Ethics 19 (4):269-284.
    The mass killings, large-scale gang rape and large-scale expulsion of the Rohingyas from Myanmar constitute one of the most repugnant world events in recent years. This article addresses the question of whether armed humanitarian intervention would have been morally permissible to protect the Rohingyas. It approaches the question from the perspective of the jus ad bellum criteria of just war theory. This approach does not yield a definitive answer because knowing whether certain jus ad bellum conditions might have been satisfied (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Legitimate Authority as a Jus Ad Bellum Condition: Defense of a Procedural Requirement in Just War Theory.Jordy Rocheleau - 2020 - Journal of Military Ethics 19 (2):99-117.
    Today, it is widely held that while authorization may be helpful in assuring that the other jus ad bellum criteria are met, legitimate authority is not itself a condition for just recourse to war....
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Changing Nature of Legitimate Authority in the Just War Tradition.Amy E. Eckert - 2020 - Journal of Military Ethics 19 (2):84-98.
    During the Middle Ages, the principle of legitimate or right authority constituted a central part of the just war tradition. The question of which actors had the authority to declare war was so cen...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation