Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Guinea Pig Duties: 8. Another Way.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (4):132-135.
    This series of articles have explored the need that society has for clinical research to be done and the consequent sets of duties that call on the one hand upon investigators to carry it out and on the other upon patients to be subjects of it. The purpose of the discussions has been to understand what should be the relationship between investigators and patient-subjects in order that both might meet their obligations effectively, efficiently, safely and with mutual respect. Here I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Guinea Pig Duties: 4. The Extent and Limits of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (4):115-121.
    In a series of articles, I set out my belief that investigators and subjects of research should work together in a partnership based in shared aims. Such a relationship – quite different from what is usual today – would impose duties on both partners. In earlier papers I explored the origin and nature of the duties that would fall on patients; here I examine their limits.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Guinea Pig Duties: 6. Non-Consensual Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (2):51-58.
    In the first five of these articles I have questioned the justice, and effectiveness, of total dependence in clinical research on willing volunteers. I have explored ways that might better and more equitably spread the burden of participating in clinical research as subjects of it. Here I consider this question: if consent is the barrier, must we regard consent as indispensable?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Guinea Pig Duties: 3. The Nature of Patients' Duties in Clinical Research.T. J. Steiner - 2005 - Research Ethics 1 (3):84-89.
    In a series of articles, I argue for a different relationship between investigators and subjects of clinical research – one that is based on partnership in shared aims. This would require significant behavioural change since any relationship of this nature requires each partner to recognise their duties within it. This third essay examines the duties that would fall on patients in this partnership.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations