Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Sale of Sperm, Health Records, Minimally Conscious States, and Duties of Candour.Cameron Stewart, Bernadette Richards, Richard Huxtable, Bill Madden & Tina Cockburn - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):7-14.
    Sale of Sperm, Health Records, Minimally Conscious States, and Duties of Candour Content Type Journal Article Category Recent Developments Pages 7-14 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9347-6 Authors Cameron Stewart, Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2006 Bernadette Richards, Law School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia 5005 Richard Huxtable, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TH UK Bill Madden, School of Law, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Tina (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Futility Determination as a Process: Problems with Medical Sovereignty, Legal Issues and the Strengths and Weakness of the Procedural Approach. [REVIEW]Cameron Stewart - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):155-163.
    Futility is not a purely medical concept. Its subjective nature requires a balanced procedural approach where competing views can be aired and in which disputes can be resolved with procedural fairness. Law should play an important role in this process. Pure medical models of futility are based on a false claim of medical sovereignty. Procedural approaches avoid the problems of such claims. This paper examines the arguments for and against the adoption of a procedural approach to futility determination.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (18 other versions)Recent developments.John Coggon, Cameron Stewart & Laura Williamson - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):141-144.
    Recent Developments Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11673-010-9235-5 Authors John Coggon, University of Manchester Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Institute for Science, Ethics, and Innovation, School of Law Manchester UK Cameron Stewart, University of Sydney Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics, Sydney Law School Sydney NSW 2006 Australia Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 7 Journal Issue Volume 7, Number 2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Property in Tissue and Negligent Conception.Bernadette Richards - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (4):437-440.
    Property in Human Tissue It seems that a recurring theme in our Recent Developments is the issue of property rights in tissue . This has most commonly been associated with access to reproductive material and begins from the presumption of no property in tissue. A recent decision for the Superior Court of Justice, Ontario, whilst unsuccessful on largely procedural grounds, warrants a brief note because it adds to the general discourse on property in tissue and adopts a different approach. Piljak (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (18 other versions)Recent Developments.John Coggon & Cameron Stewart - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):3-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (18 other versions)Recent Developments.John Coggon & Cameron Stewart - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (2):141-144.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark