Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Who shall be the arbiter of our intuitions?Daniel Kahneman - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):339-340.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • An Oblique Epistemic Defence of Conceptual Analysis.Alexander S. Harper - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (3):235-256.
    This article argues, against contemporary experimentalist criticism, that conceptual analysis has epistemic value, with a structure that encourages the development of interesting hypotheses which are of the right form to be valuable in diverse areas of philosophy. The article shows, by analysis of the Gettier programme, that conceptual analysis shares the proofs and refutations form Lakatos identified in mathematics. Upon discovery of a counterexample, this structure aids the search for a replacement hypothesis. The search is guided by heuristics. The heuristics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):317-370.
    The object of this paper is to show why recent research in the psychology of deductive and probabilistic reasoning does not have.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   481 citations  
  • The Normativity of Logic in a Psychologistic Framework: Three Approaches.Simone Melis - 2021 - Dissertation, University of Turin
    Contemporary psychologism has been amended for most of the objections by its opponents over a century ago. However, some authors still raise doubts about its ability to account for some peculiar properties of logic. In particular, it is argued that the psychological universality of patterns of inferential behavior is not sufficient to account for the normativity of logic. In this paper, I deal with the issue and offer three alternative solutions that do not rely on mere empirical universality. I will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • “Is” and “ought” in cognitive science.William G. Lycan - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):344-345.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • The irrational, the unreasonable, and the wrong.Avishai Margalit & Maya Bar-Hillel - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):346-349.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Rationality and the sanctity of competence.Hillel J. Einhorn & Robin M. Hogarth - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):334-335.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Some questions regarding the rationality of a demonstration of human rationality.Robert J. Sternberg - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):352-353.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The importance of cognitive illusions.Peter Wason - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):356-356.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Davidson's Semantic Program.Stephen P. Stich - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):201-227.
    Donald Davidson did it. He did it slowly, deliberately, in more than a half dozen widely noted essays. What he did was to elaborate a program for the study of empirical semantics. Nor did he stop there. He went on to apply his program to some of the problems that have long bedeviled semantics: action sentences, indirect discourse and propositional attitudes. My goal in this paper is to assess Davidson's achievement. The first step is to assemble the program from the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A conflict between van Inwagen’s metaontology and his ontology.David Fisher - 2019 - Synthese 198 (1):707-722.
    Peter van Inwagen has in recent decades made significant and influential contributions to metaphysics. In his Material Beings he advanced a novel ontology according to which chairs and other medium-sized dry goods don’t really exist. He went on to make important contributions to metaontology. Parts of his Ontology, Identity, and Modality and Existence: Essays in Ontology defend a broadly Quinean conception of existence questions and how to address them. I argue that the metaontology articulated in those later works is in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Propensity, evidence, and diagnosis.J. L. Mackie - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):345-346.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • L. J. Cohen versus Bayesianism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):349-349.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Human rationality: Misleading linguistic analogies.Geoffrey Sampson - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):350-351.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Improvements in human reasoning and an error in L. J. Cohen's.David H. Krantz - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):340-340.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • Can children's irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?Sam Glucksberg - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):337-338.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Should Bayesians sometimes neglect base rates?Isaac Levi - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):342-343.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Conditional probability, taxicabs, and martingales.Brian Skyrms - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):351-352.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Are there any a priori constraints on the study of rationality?L. Jonathan Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):359-370.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Status of the rationality assumption in psychology.Marvin S. Cohen - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):332-333.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • The persistence of cognitive illusions.Persi Diaconis & David Freedman - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):333-334.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Unphilosophical probability.Sandy L. Zabell - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):358-359.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Competence, performance, and ignorance.Robert W. Weisberg - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):356-358.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cohen on contraposition.N. E. Wetherick - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):358-358.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Independent forebrain and brainstem controls for arousal and sleep.Jaime R. Villablanca - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):494-496.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Human reasoning: Can we judge before we understand?Richard A. Griggs - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):338-339.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • L. J. Cohen, again: On the evaluation of inductive intuitions.Amos Tversky - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):354-356.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Meta-Ethics Naturalized.David Zimmerman - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):637 - 662.
    Meta-ethics without normative ethics is empty. In the current climate this hardly needs emphasis: since 1960 or so philosophers in the English-speaking world have put away their earlier reluctance to think about substantive moral issues. For a while, in fact, it seemed that normative ethics would completely dominate the scene in the way metaethics once did, but, happily, this situation has begun to change with the appearance of a stimulating and illuminating body of work on the rational basis of morality. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Inferential competence: right you are, if you think you are.Stephen P. Stich - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):353-354.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Rationality is a necessary presupposition in psychology.Jan Smedslund - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):352-352.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Lay arbitration of rules of inference.Richard E. Nisbett - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):349-350.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Performing competently.Lola L. Lopes - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):343-344.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Intuition, competence, and performance.Henry E. Kyburg - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):341-342.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Another vote for rationality.Mary Henle - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):339-339.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Can any statements about human behavior be empirically validated?Baruch Fischoff - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):336-337.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On defining rationality unreasonably.J. St B. T. Evans & P. Pollard - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):335-336.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Rational animal?Simon Blackburn - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):331-332.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations