Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Count nouns, mass nouns and their acquisition (1997).David Nicolas - manuscript
    In English, some common nouns, like 'dog', can combine with determiners like 'a' and 'many', but not with 'much', while other nouns, like 'water', can be used together with 'much', but not with 'a' and 'many'. These common nouns have been respectively called count nouns (CNs) and mass nouns (MNs). How do children learn to use CNs and MNs in the appropriate contexts? Gaining a better understanding of this is the goal of this paper. To do so, it is important (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The conversational condition on horn scales.Yo Matsumoto - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1):21 - 60.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  • Summation relations and portions of stuff.Maureen Donnelly & Thomas Bittner - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (2):167 - 185.
    According to the prevalent 'sum view' of stuffs, each portion of stuff is a mereological sum of its subportions. The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the sum view in the light of a modal temporal mereology which distinguishes between different varieties of summation relations. While admitting David Barnett's recent counter-example to the sum view, we show that there is nonetheless an important sense in which all portions of stuff are sums of their subportions. We use our summation relations (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Evaluating competing linguistic theories with child language data: The case of the mass-count distinction. [REVIEW]Virginia C. Gathercole - 1986 - Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (2):151 - 190.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Categorial languages.M. J. Cresswell - 1977 - Studia Logica 36 (4):257 - 269.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Lessons from Descriptive Indexicals.Kjell Johan Sæbø - 2015 - Mind 124 (496):1111-1161.
    Two main methods for analysing de re readings of definite descriptions in intensional contexts coexist: that of evaluating the description in the actual world, whether by means of scope, actuality operators, or non-local world binding, and that of substituting another description, usually one expressing a salient or ‘vivid’ acquaintance relation to an attitude holder, prior to evaluation. Recent work on so-called descriptive indexicals suggests that contrary to common assumptions, both methods are needed, for different ends. This paper aims to show (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Logical inference in English: A preliminary analysis.Patrick Suppes - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (4):375 - 391.
    The perfect fit of syntactic derivability and logical consequence in first-order logic is one of the most celebrated facts of modern logic. In the present flurry of attention given to the semantics of natural language, surprisingly little effort has been focused on the problem of logical inference in natural language and the possibility of its completeness. Even the traditional theory of the syllogism does not give a thorough analysis of the restricted syntax it uses.My objective is to show how a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The logico-linguistic evidence underlying Montague's language descriptions.William S. Cooper - 1978 - Synthese 38 (1):39 - 71.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Intentional identity interpreted: A case study of the relations among quantifiers, pronouns, and propositional attitudes. [REVIEW]Esa Saarinen - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (2):151 - 223.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • A note on existential import.Michael Böttner - 1988 - Studia Logica 47 (1):35 - 40.
    It is shown that a linguistically well-motivated semantical analysis of certain extensions of categorical sentences is compatible with a semantics that fulfils the so-called existential import condition, but is not compatible with a semantics that does not fulfil this condition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • La distinction entre noms massifs et noms comptables.David Nicolas - 2002 - Editions Peeters.
    Cet ouvrage est consacre a l'etude de la distinction linguistique entre noms massifs (lait, mobilier, desordre, amour...) et noms comptables (chat, equipe, combat, chose...). Les premiers sont normalement invariables, tandis que les seconds s'emploient librement au singulier et au pluriel. Apres avoir etabli qu'il s'agit bien d'une distinction morpho-syntaxique, l'ouvrage discute la possibilite de caracteriser semantiquement cette distinction. Les recherches existantes ne tiennent compte, essentiellement, que des noms s'appliquant au domaine materiel. Ce travail, au contraire, examine en detail aussi bien (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (1 other version)Mass and count quantifiers.Jim Higginbotham - 1994 - Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (5):447 - 480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • A parsing method for Montague grammars.Joyce Friedman & David S. Warren - 1978 - Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (3):347 - 372.
    The main result in this paper is a method for obtaining derivation trees from sentences of certain formal grammars. No parsing algorithm was previously known to exist for these grammars.Applied to Montague's PTQ the method produces all parses that could correspond to different meanings. The technique directly addresses scope and reference and provides a framework for examining these phenomena. The solution for PTQ is implemented in an efficient and useful computer program.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Ambiguity and indifference.Alan Reeves - 1975 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):220 – 237.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations