Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Agencies, capacities, and anthropic self-selection.Milan M. Cirkovic - 2004 - In Margaret A. Simons, Marybeth Timmermann & Mary Beth Mader (eds.), Philosophical Writings. University of Illinois Press. pp. 27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ontologically simple theories do not indicate the true nature of complex biological systems: three test cases.Michael Fry - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (2):1-44.
    A longstanding philosophical premise perceives simplicity as a desirable attribute of scientific theories. One of several raised justifications for this notion is that simple theories are more likely to indicate the true makeup of natural systems. Qualitatively parsimonious hypotheses and theories keep to a minimum the number of different postulated entities within a system. Formulation of such ontologically simple working hypotheses proved to be useful in the experimental probing of narrowly defined bio systems. It is less certain, however, whether qualitatively (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Science, Worldviews, and Education.Hugh G. Gauch - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (6-7):667-695.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Is Simplicity Evidence of Truth?Adolf GrüNbaum - 2007 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 61:261-275.
    In a short 1997 book entitled Simplicity as Evidence of Truth, the Oxford philosopher Richard Swinburne has put forward the following thesis summarily: ‘… for theories (of equal scope) rendering equally probable our observational data (which, for brevity I shall call equally good at “predicting”), fitting equally well with background knowledge, the simplest is most probably true’.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Second reply to grünbaum.Richard Swinburne - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
    I give a detailed defence against Grunbaum’s 2004 attack on my Bayesian argument for the existence of God from various features of the universe (its conformity to simple laws, the laws being such as to lead to the evolution of humans, etc.). Theism postulates the simplest possible stopping point for explanation of the various features which I mention, and is such that it makes the accounts of those features more probable than they would be otherwise.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations