Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hayek at the Santa Fe Institute: Origins, Models, and Organization of the Cradle of Complexity Sciences.Fabrizio Li Vigni - 2022 - Centaurus 64 (2):443-481.
    Complexity sciences are one of the most mediatized scientific fields of the last 40 years. While this domain has attracted the attention of many philosophers of science, its normative views have not yet been the object of any systematic study. This article is a contribution to the thin social science literature about complexity sciences and proposes a contribution focused on an analysis of the origins, models, and organization of the Santa Fe Institute (SFI), cradle of the field. The paper defends (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A new definition of complexity in a risk analysis setting.A. Jensen & T. Aven - 2018 - Reliability Engineering and System Safety 171:169-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Promises of Complexity Sciences: A Critique.Fabrizio Li Vigni - 2023 - Perspectives on Science 31 (4):465-502.
    Complexity sciences have become famous worldwide thanks to several popular books that served as echo chambers of their promises. These consisted in departing from “classical science” defined as deterministic, reductionist, analytic and mono-disciplinary. Their founders and supporters declared that complexity sciences were going to give rise (or that they have given rise) to a post-Laplacian, antireductionist, holistic and interdisciplinary approach. By taking a closer look at their content and practices, I argue in this article that, because of their physics-oriented, computationalist, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Regimes of Evidence in Complexity Sciences.Fabrizio Li Vigni - 2021 - Perspectives on Science 29 (1):62-103.
    Since their inception in the 1980s, complexity sciences have been described as a revolutionary new domain of research. By describing some of the practices and assumptions of its representatives, the present article shows that this field is an association of subdisciplines laying on existing disciplinary footholds. The general question guiding us here is: On what basis do complexity scientists consider their inquiry methods and results as valuable? To answer it, I describe five “epistemic argumentative regimes,” namely the ways in which (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation