Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the Definability of Leśniewski’s Copula ‘is’ in Some Ontology-Like Theories.Marcin Łyczak & Andrzej Pietruszczak - 2018 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 47 (4):233-263.
    We formulate a certain subtheory of Ishimoto’s [1] quantifier-free fragment of Leśniewski’s ontology, and show that Ishimoto’s theory can be reconstructed in it. Using an epimorphism theorem we prove that our theory is complete with respect to a suitable set-theoretic interpretation. Furthermore, we introduce the name constant 1 and we prove its adequacy with respect to the set-theoretic interpretation. Ishimoto’s theory enriched by the constant 1 is also reconstructed in our formalism with into which 1 has been introduced. Finally we (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A System of Ontology Based on the Three Principles Concerning Predications and Singularity of Names.Toshiharu Waragai & Keiichi Oyamada - 2011 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 39 (1):31-43.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Syntactical Proof of Translation and Separation Theorems on Subsystems of Elementary Ontology.Mitio Takano - 1991 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 37 (9‐12):129-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Syntactical Proof of Translation and Separation Theorems on Subsystems of Elementary Ontology.Mitio Takano - 1991 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 37 (9-12):129-138.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Sequent Calculus for the Lesniewskian Modal Logic.Mitio Takano - 1994 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 8 (4):191-201.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Sound Interpretation of Leśniewski's Epsilon in Modal Logic KTB.Takao Inoue - 2021 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 50 (4):455-463.
    In this paper, we shall show that the following translation \(I^M\) from the propositional fragment \(\bf L_1\) of Leśniewski's ontology to modal logic \(\bf KTB\) is sound: for any formula \(\phi\) and \(\psi\) of \(\bf L_1\), it is defined as (M1) \(I^M(\phi \vee \psi) = I^M(\phi) \vee I^M(\psi)\), (M2) \(I^M(\neg \phi) = \neg I^M(\phi)\), (M3) \(I^M(\epsilon ab) = \Diamond p_a \supset p_a. \wedge. \Box p_a \supset \Box p_b.\wedge. \Diamond p_b \supset p_a\), where \(p_a\) and \(p_b\) are propositional variables corresponding to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark