Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Immanent Counter-Enlightenment

In Ronald Beiner & Wayne Norman (eds.), Canadian political philosophy: contemporary reflections. Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press. pp. 386--400 (2001)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Pragmatist Transcendence in Rorty’s Metaphilosophy.Tracy Llanera & Nicholas H. Smith - 2019 - Analyse & Kritik 41 (1):97-116.
    This article argues that a pragmatist ambition to transcendence undergirds Richard Rorty’s metaphilosophy. That transcendence might play a positive role in Rorty’s work might seem implausible given his well-known rejection of the idea that human practices are accountable to some external, Archimedean standpoint, and his endorsement of the historicist view that standards of rationality are products of time and chance. It is true that Rorty’s contributions to epistemology, philosophy of mind and metaphysics have this anti-transcendentalist character. But in his metaphilosophy, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mundo cerrado, mundo abierto las estructuras del pensamiento moderno según Charles Taylor.Alejandra Fierro Valbuena - 2016 - Escritos 24 (52):141-160.
    La modernidad como época histórica, pero sobre todo como imaginario social, ha sido uno de los temas más estudiados de manera amplia por el pensador canadiense Charles Taylor. En este artículo se explora el concepto de Estructuras cerradas de mundo a través del cual el autor afirma que la modernidad se mueve en un marco de comprensión cerrado a la trascendencia y que dicho marco ha sido configurado desde el pensamiento filosófico como consecuencia de algunas posturas epistemológicas, éticas y antropológicas. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Alternative secularisms.Redhead Mark - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (5):639-666.
    This article focuses on Charles Taylor’s and William Connolly’s attempts to fashion alternative forms of secular public reasoning to those of liberals like Rawls and Galston. I provide a weak defense of Taylor against both Connolly and many of Taylor’s liberal secular foes. Despite its noted shortcomings that Connolly can help to address, Taylor’s model does provide a more adequate basis for thinking through a public morality appropriate to the times because it takes seriously the hold certain values have on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation