Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Vices of Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):413-422.
    What should a virtue theory of argumentation say about fallacious reasoning? If good arguments are virtuous, then fallacies are vicious. Yet fallacies cannot just be identified with vices, since vices are dispositional properties of agents whereas fallacies are types of argument. Rather, if the normativity of good argumentation is explicable in terms of virtues, we should expect the wrongness of bad argumentation to be explicable in terms of vices. This approach is defended through analysis of several fallacies, with particular emphasis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Practicing Critical Thinking in an Educational Psychology Classroom: Reflections from a Cultural-Historical Perspective.Elena Lyutykh - 2009 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 45 (4):377-391.
    (2009). Practicing Critical Thinking in an Educational Psychology Classroom: Reflections from a Cultural-Historical Perspective. Educational Studies: Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 377-391.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • General Self-Efficacy Mediates the Effect of Family Socioeconomic Status on Critical Thinking in Chinese Medical Students.Lei Huang, Yun-Lin Liang, Jiao-Jiao Hou, Jessica Thai, Yu-Jia Huang, Jia-Xuan Li, Ying Zeng & Xu-Dong Zhao - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 9:401730.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Inventory of Instruments of Critical Thinking.John Follman, Carolyn Lavely & Neal Berger - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability.Robert H. Ennis - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
    Assuming that critical thinking dispositions are at least as important as critical thinking abilities, Ennis examines the concept of critical thinking disposition and suggests some criteria for judging sets of them. He considers a leading approach to their analysis and offers as an alternative a simpler set, including the disposition to seek alternatives and be open to them. After examining some gender-bias and subject-specificity challenges to promoting critical thinking dispositions, he notes some difficulties involved in assessing critical thinking dispositions, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations