Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Of gaps, gluts, and God's ability to change the past.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 32 (4):305-316.
    Can God change the past? The standard Aquinas line answers this question negatively: God cannot change the past since such an act implies a contradiction; thus is not within the purview of God's omnipotence. While the Aquinas line is well-known, there are other, non-standard solutions to this question. In this paper, I look into such answers. In particular, I explore those answers that employ the resources of gappy and glutty logics. I show how these solutions are motivated and how each (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Atheism and Dialetheism; or, ‘Why I Am Not a (Paraconsistent) Christian’.Zach Weber - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (2):401-407.
    ABSTRACTIn ‘Theism and Dialetheism’, Cotnoir explores the idea that dialetheism can help with some puzzles about omnipotence in theology. In this note, I delineate another asp...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Gappying Curry Redux.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2024 - Sophia 63 (1):5-11.
    In ‘Currying omnipotence: A reply to Beall and Cotnoir’, Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia argue that Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir’s gappy solution to the traditional paradox of unrestricted omnipotence does not extend to a Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that it does extend to it.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Omnipotence, Gaps, and Curry.Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (4):141-148.
    In “God of the Gaps: A Neglected Reply to God’s Stone Problem”, Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir offer a gappy solution to the paradox of (unrestricted) omnipotence that is typified by the classic stone problem. Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia, however, have recently argued that this solution could not be extended to a more serious Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that such a gappy solution does extend to it.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations