Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The New Experimentalism and the Value of Experimental Justification in Empirical Sciences.Mieczysław Bombik - 2020 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 56 (S2):21-59.
    This article briefly presents and characterizes a relatively young (nineteen-nineties) trend in methodology, the theory of science – and philosophy, called “the new experimentalism”. The fundamental problem is determined by the question about the value of the new experimentalism and experimental grounds of scientific knowledge in empirical sciences. In the first part of the article, the previous (old) experimentalism is presented. First of all, the history of the experimental method is outlined and the definitions of experiment, object, phenomenon, and of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Philosophy, Drama and Literature.Rick Benitez - 2011 - In Graham Robert Oppy, Nick Trakakis, Lynda Burns, Steven Gardner & Fiona Leigh (eds.), A companion to philosophy in Australia & New Zealand. Clayton, Victoria, Australia: Monash University Publishing. pp. 371-372.
    Philosophy and Literature is an internationally renowned refereed journal founded by Denis Dutton at the University of Canterbury, Christchurch. It is now published by the Johns Hopkins University Press. Since its inception in 1976, Philosophy and Literature has been concerned with the relation between literary and philosophical studies, publishing articles on the philosophical interpretation of literature as well as the literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature has sometimes been regarded as iconoclastic, in the sense that it repudiates academic pretensions, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • El caso Galileo o las Paradojas de una Racionalidad Científica Positivista según Paul Karl Feyerabend.Teresa Gargiulo - 2014 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 47:53-88.
    El caso Galileo significó para Feyerabend la oportunidad de mostrar metodológica e históricamente las paradojas y limitaciones de una noción positivista de ciencia. A través de este hecho paradigmático de la ciencia moderna el vienés demuestra las contradicciones que suponen los distintos intentos del neo-positivismo lógico por establecer un criterio de demarcación que defina qué es la ciencia. Da cuenta de cómo aquellos elementos frente a los cuales el positivismo lógico procura delimitar una definición negativa de ciencia, constituyen paradojalmente el (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A Galilean Approach to the Galileo Affair, 1609–2009.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (1):51-66.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark