Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Educating citizens to public reason: what can we learn from interfaith dialogue?Aurélia Bardon, Matteo Bonotti & Steven T. Zech - 2024 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 27 (7):1050-1074.
    John Rawls’s political liberalism demands that reasonable citizens comply with the duty of civility, which limits the justification of state action to public reasons. However, many religious citizens in liberal democratic societies reject the exclusion of religious reasons from public debate. What can be done to encourage these citizens to endorse public reason? Rawls proposes the idea of reasoning from conjecture (RC), i.e. directly engaging with someone’s comprehensive doctrine and showing them that such a doctrine actually supports public reason. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Fluid Movement of the Spirit: (Re)Conceptualizing Gender in Pentecostalism.Joel D. Daniels - 2022 - Journal of Religious Ethics 50 (4):577-599.
    Claiming close to 800 million adherents, Pentecostalism is the fastest growing religious community in the world; nevertheless, the movement remains under‐researched, encouraging more academic investment. This article takes on this task by exploring Pentecostalism regarding gender and sex. Why have Pentecostals ardently supported gender normativity? Why have Pentecostal denominations in the United States adamantly opposed the recent Equality Acts bill? This essay's argument is that Pentecostal belief and practice, rooted in theology and pneumatology, actually denounce gender bifurcation, supporting instead fluid (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Religiosity and Sexual Behavior: Tense Relationships and Underlying Affects and Cognitions in Samples of Christian and Muslim Traditions.Caroline Rigo & Vassilis Saroglou - 2018 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 40 (2-3):176-201.
    Religion's historical mistrust of sexuality shapes people's behavior by inhibiting liberal sexuality. Still, it is unclear whether this inhibitive role also includes common, normative sexual behavior, particularly in secularized contexts. Moreover, the possible mediating effects emotions, affects, and thoughts have on the association between religiosity and restricted sexuality have never been integrated into a single model. Finally, cross-religious differences in common sexual behavior have still yet to be documented. We addressed these three issues in two studies, with samples of Catholic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark