Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Markets or Democracy for Education? A Reply to Stewart Ranson.James Tooley - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):21-34.
    This paper, which offers a positive assessment of the role of markets in education, is a 'reply' to an earlier contribution to the Journal in which Stewart Ranson argues that markets are intrinsically flawed as a vehicle for improving educational opportunities. The 'reply', among other things, argues that Ranson fails to address the shortcomings of education under democratic control and ignores the educational benefits of authentic markets.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Low-Fee Private Schools in Developing Nations: Some Cautionary Remarks.Juan Espindola - 2020 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (1):55-77.
    This paper examines and rejects two normative justifications for low-fee private schools, whose expansion throughout the Global South in recent years has been significant. The first justification – what I shall call the ideal thesis – contends that LFPS are the best mechanism to expand access to quality education, particularly at the primary level, and that the premise of their success is that they reject educational equality and state intervention in educational affairs, traditionally associated with public schools, embracing instead educational (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (2 other versions)Politics, markets and schools politics, markets and America's schools.James Tooley - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (2):257–264.
    James Tooley; Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America’s Schools, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 28, Issue 2, 30 May 2006, Pages.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Markets or democracy for education? A reply to Stewart Ranson.James Tooley - 1995 - British Journal of Educational Studies 43 (1):21-34.
    This paper, which offers a positive assessment of the role of markets in education, is a 'reply' to an earlier contribution to the Journal in which Stewart Ranson argues that markets are intrinsically flawed as a vehicle for improving educational opportunities. The 'reply', among other things, argues that Ranson fails to address the shortcomings of education under democratic control and ignores the educational benefits of authentic markets.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America’s Schools.James Tooley - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (2):257-264.
    James Tooley; Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America’s Schools, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 28, Issue 2, 30 May 2006, Pages.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (2 other versions)Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America’s Schools.James Tooley - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (2):257-264.
    James Tooley; Politics, Markets and Schools Politics, Markets and America’s Schools, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 28, Issue 2, 30 May 2006, Pages.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark