Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A representative politics of nature|[quest]| Bruno Latour on collectives and constitutions.Kerry H. Whiteside - 2013 - Contemporary Political Theory 12 (3):185.
    Bruno Latour purports to transform political ecology by turning attention away from presumed damages to ‘nature’ and toward unproblematised scientific and social processes through which people and things stabilise their identities. He extends the categories of political representation to those processes in hopes of founding a ‘parliament of things’. Such an assembly would settle the terms of coexistence between people and things without undue deference to scientific knowledge claims and without a priori judgments about nature's value. This article challenges Latour's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • A representative politics of nature? Bruno Latour on collectives and constitutions.Kerry H. Whiteside - 2013 - Contemporary Political Theory 12 (3):185-205.
    Bruno Latour purports to transform political ecology by turning attention away from presumed damages to ‘nature’ and toward unproblematised scientific and social processes through which people and things stabilise their identities. He extends the categories of political representation to those processes in hopes of founding a ‘parliament of things’. Such an assembly would settle the terms of coexistence between people and things without undue deference to scientific knowledge claims and without a priori judgments about nature's value. This article challenges Latour's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Public participation in the making of science policy.Darrin Durant - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 189-225.
    This paper argues that, because Science and Technology Studies lost contact with political philosophy, its defense of public participation in policy-making involving technical claims is normatively unsatisfactory. Current penchants for political under-laboring and normative individualism are critiqued, and the connections between STS and theorists of deliberative democracy are explored. A conservative normativity is proposed, and STS positions on public participation are discussed in relation to current questions about individual and group rights in a liberal democracy. The result is avenues to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations