Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. We Don’t Offer What Can’t Be Chosen: Why Harmful Consequences Should Not Be “Decisive” in Assessing Decision-Making.Philip Day, Marc Tunzi & David J. Satin - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (10):60-62.
    In this Open Peer Commentary, we draw on our clinical experience to argue that instrumental paternalism carves a pathway to competent refusal of medical intervention. Whether C successfully navigat...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Informed Consent: What Must Be Disclosed and What Must Be Understood?”.Danielle Bromwich & Joseph Millum - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):1-5.
    In “Informed Consent: What Must be Disclosed and What Must be Understood?”, we reject a dogma at the heart of research ethics. We demonstrate that the constitutive claim...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
    Home | Bibliographies | About PhilArchive | Contact us | Code of conduct

    CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
    PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
    This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

    Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo