Switch to: References

Citations of:

Discussion

[author unknown]
Cognition 69 (2):231-241 (1998)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (2 other versions)Twenty-Five Years After Quinlan: A Review of the Jurisprudence of Death and Dying. [REVIEW]Norman L. Cantor - 2001 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):182-196.
    Ever since the 1960s, when medical science became capable of prolonging the dying process beyond bounds that many patients would find acceptable, people have sought “death with dignity,” or “a natural death,” or “a good death.” Once debilitation from a fatal affliction has reached a personally intolerable point, dying patients have sought to control the manner and timing of death via diverse techniques. Some sought the disconnection of life-sustaining medical interventions, such as respirators and dialysis machines. Beyond freedom from unwelcome (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness.N. Block - 2001 - Cognition 79 (1-2):197--219.
    Dehaene and Naccache, Dennett and Jack and Shallice “see convergence coming from many different quarters on a version of the neuronal global workspace model†(Dennett, p. 1). (Boldface references are to papers in this volume.) On the contrary, even within this volume, there are commitments to very different perspectives on consciousness. And these differing perspectives are based on tacit differences in philosophical starting places that should be made explicit.  Indeed, it is not clear that different uses of “consciousness†and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations