Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Teaching Scientific Integrity in Academia: What and How Students Want to Learn?N. Sira, M. Decker, C. Lemke, A. Winkens, C. Leicht-Scholten & D. Groß - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-20.
    Training in scientific integrity continues to be an important topic in universities and other research institutions. Its main goal is to prevent scientific misconduct and promote good scientific practice. However, there is still no consensus on how scientific integrity should be taught. Moreover, the perspective of those who receive such training is often underrepresented. Yet it is precisely their interests and needs that must be considered when developing educational programs. Against this backdrop, we conducted a mixed-methods study with the goal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Training to Act FAIR: A Pre-Post Study on Teaching FAIR Guiding Principles to (Future) Researchers in Higher Education.Julia Priess-Buchheit, Noémie Hermeking & Thomas W. D. Möbius - forthcoming - Journal of Academic Ethics:1-17.
    The scientific community has tried to implement the FAIR guiding principles to foster open science actions in data-driven research in higher education since 2016. However, what strategies work and do not in fostering open science actions still need to be determined. This article is the first step to closing this research gap by examining one strategy, the effectiveness of FAIR training in higher education. With a pre-post test design, the study evaluates the short-term effectiveness of FAIR training on students’ scientific (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Impact and Assessment of Research Integrity Teaching: A Systematic Literature Review.Daniel Crean, Bert Gordijn & Alan J. Kearns - 2024 - Science and Engineering Ethics 30 (4):1-15.
    Presented here is a systematic literature review of what the academic literature asserts about: (1) the stages of the ethical decision-making process (i.e. awareness, reasoning, motivation, and action) that are claimed to be improved or not improved by RI teaching and whether these claims are supported by evidence; (2) the measurements used to determine the effectiveness of RI teaching; and (3) the stage/s of the ethical decision-making process that are difficult to assess. Regarding (1), awareness was the stage most claimed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark