Switch to: References

Citations of:

Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support

Eva M. Van Baarle, Marieke C. Potma, Maria E. C. van Hoek, Laura A. Hartman, Bert A. C. Molewijk & Jelle L. P. van Gurp

BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-11 (2019)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

Servant Leadership and Followers Prosocial Rule-Breaking: The Mediating Role of Public Service Motivation.Naqib Ullah Khan, Muhammad Zada, Asad Ullah, Afraseyab Khattak, Heesup Han, Antonio Ariza-Montes & Luis Araya Castillo - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:848531.details This research explores the effect of servant leadership on prosocial rule-breaking (PSRB) and the mediating mechanism of public service motivation (PSM) between the association of servant leadership and PSRB. The said phenomenon is examined in the civil service context of Pakistan during the continuing crises of the COVID-19 pandemic, a situation where the traditional civil service policy and rule system has become highly complicated for passionate employees’ service performance and efficiency, and where servant leadership has received greater attention for inspiring (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Quality Characteristics for Clinical Ethics Support in the Netherlands.Laura Hartman, Eva Van Baarle, Marielle Diepeveen, Guy Widdershoven & Bert Molewijk - 2022 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (1):22-32.details Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES.Laura Hartman, Guy Widdershoven, Eva van Baarle, Froukje Weidema & Bert Molewijk - 2022 - HEC Forum 34 (2):169-186.details The prevalence of Clinical ethics support services is increasing. Yet, questions about what quality of CES entails and how to foster the quality of CES remain. This paper describes the development of a national network, which aimed to conceptualize and foster the quality of CES in the Netherlands simultaneously. Our methodology was inspired by a responsive evaluation approach which shares some of our key theoretical presuppositions of CES. A responsive evaluation methodology engages stakeholders in developing quality standards of a certain (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations
Evaluating assessment tools of the quality of clinical ethics consultations: a systematic scoping review from 1992 to 2019.Nicholas Yue Shuen Yoon, Yun Ting Ong, Hong Wei Yap, Kuang Teck Tay, Elijah Gin Lim, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Wei Qiang Lim, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Ying Pin Toh, Min Chiam, Stephen Mason & Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna - 2020 - BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1):1-11.details BackgroundAmidst expanding roles in education and policy making, questions have been raised about the ability of Clinical Ethics Committees (CEC) s to carry out effective ethics consultations (CECons). However recent reviews of CECs suggest that there is no uniformity to CECons and no effective means of assessing the quality of CECons. To address this gap a systematic scoping review of prevailing tools used to assess CECons was performed to foreground and guide the design of a tool to evaluate the quality (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 5 citations

1