Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Methodological problems in evolutionary biology III. Selection and levels of organization.Wim J. Van Der Steen & Bart Voorzanger - 1984 - Acta Biotheoretica 33 (3):199-213.
    Apparently factual disagreement on the level at which selection operates often results from different interpretations of the term “selection”. Attempts to resolve terminological problems must come to grips with a dilemma: a narrow interpretation of “selection” may lead to a restricted view on evolution; a broader, less precise, definition may wrongly suggest that “selection” is the centre of a unified, integrated theory of evolution. Different concepts of selection, therefore, should carefully be kept apart.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Methodological problems in evolutionary biology IV. Stress and stress tolerance, an excercise in definitions.Wim J. Van der Steen & Martin Scholten - 1985 - Acta Biotheoretica 34 (1):81-90.
    Grime in a recently developed theory distinguished three basic plant strategies: stress tolerance,ruderality and competition. He relates them to environments characterized in terms of stress and disturbance. Classifications of strategies and environments both are ultimately defined in terms of production. This tends to make the theory tautological. If the theory is to make sense, environments had better be defined in independent terms.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Methodological problems in evolutionary biology II. Appraisal of arguments against adaptationism.Wim J. Van Der Steen - 1983 - Acta Biotheoretica 32 (3):217-222.
    Methodological analysis shows that the concepts of fitness and adaptation are more complex than the literature suggests. Various arguments against ‘adaptationism’ are inadequate since they are couched in terms of unduly simplistic notions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Methodological problems in evolutionary biology V. The import of supervenience.Wim J. van der Steen - 1986 - Acta Biotheoretica 35 (3):185-191.
    Rosenberg has rightly argued that fitness is supervenient. But he has wrongly assumed that this makes “The fittest survive” nontautologous. Supervenience makes strict reduction impossible. It sheds light on disputes concerning the testability of evolutionary theory.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark