Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Direct Dynamic Proofs for the Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations: The Flat Case.Diderik Batens & Timothy Vermeir - 2002 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12 (1):63-84.
    In [BAT 00b], the flat Rescher–Manor consequence relations — the Free, Strong, Argued, C-Based, andWeak consequence relation—were shown to be characterized by inconsistency-adaptive logics defined from the paraconsistent logic CLuN. This provided these consequence relations with a dynamic proof theory. In the present paper we show that the detour via an inconsistency-adaptive logic is not necessary. We present a direct dynamic proof theory, formulated in the language of Classical Logic, and prove its adequacy. The present paper contains the first direct (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A procedural criterion for final derivability in inconsistency-adaptive logics.Diderik Batens - 2005 - Journal of Applied Logic 3 (1):221-250.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • A general characterization of adaptive logics.Diderik Batens - 2001 - Logique Et Analyse 173 (175):45-68.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   50 citations  
  • Towards the Unification of Inconsistency Handling Mechanisms.Diderik Batens - 2000 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 8:5-31.
    It is shown that the consequence relations defined from theRescher-Manor Mechanism are all inconsistency-adaptive logics combined with a specific interpretation schema for the premises. Each of the adaptive logics isobtained by applying a suitable adaptive strategy to the paraconsistent logicCLuN.This result provides all those consequence relations with a proof theory and with a static semantics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • Non-Monotonic Set Theory as a Pragmatic Foundation of Mathematics.Peter Verdée - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (4):655-680.
    In this paper I propose a new approach to the foundation of mathematics: non-monotonic set theory. I present two completely different methods to develop set theories based on adaptive logics. For both theories there is a finitistic non-triviality proof and both theories contain (a subtle version of) the comprehension axiom schema. The first theory contains only a maximal selection of instances of the comprehension schema that do not lead to inconsistencies. The second allows for all the instances, also the inconsistent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • When some premises are more premise than others, the consequences are the real premises.Liza Verhoeven - forthcoming - Logique Et Analyse.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Two New Strategies for Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics.Kristof De Clercq - 2000 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 8:65-80.
    In this paper I present two new strategies for inconsistencyadaptive logics: the reliable sufficient information strategy of ACLuN3 andthe minimally abnormal sufficient information strategy of ACLuN4. I giveproof theory and semantics for both ACLuN3 and ACLuN4. I also compare them with the well-known inconsistency-adaptive logics ACLuN1 andACLuN2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations