Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Responding to Debunking Arguments.Hans Van Eyghen - 2022 - Philosophia Reformata 87 (2):195-207.
    In this response article, I argue that Launonen’s criticisms either are beyond the scope of my argument in chapter 5 of Arguing from Cognitive Science of Religion or wrongfully presume that evolutionary explanations exhaustively explain religious beliefs. I also criticize Launonen’s claim that arguments in terms of divine design are preferable to arguments in terms of truth-tracking cognitive mechanisms.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The evolution of puritanical morality has not always served to strengthen cooperation, but to reinforce male dominance and exclude women.Konrad Szocik - 2023 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e316.
    Puritanical morality regulates a range of seemingly insignificant behaviors, including those involving human sexuality. A sizable portion of the latter particularly burdens women, who are held responsible for the moral conduct of men. In my paper, I show that these norms have not necessarily served to evolve cooperation, but to subjugate and eliminate women from public life.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Religion as a natural laboratory for understanding human behavior.Jordan W. Moon - forthcoming - Archive for the Psychology of Religion.
    What do we gain from the scientific study of religion? One possibility is that religious contexts are unique, and cognition within these contexts is worth understanding. Another possibility is that religion can be viewed as a laboratory for understanding psychology and culture more broadly. Rather than limiting the study of religion to a single context, I argue that the study of religion is useful precisely because it illuminates secular psychological and cultural processes. I first outline my practical approach to psychology (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark