Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Collatz conjecture. A case study in mathematical problem solving.Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (1):7-23.
    In previous papers (see Van Bendegem [1993], [1996], [1998], [2000], [2004], [2005], and jointly with Van Kerkhove [2005]) we have proposed the idea that, if we look at what mathematicians do in their daily work, one will find that conceiving and writing down proofs does not fully capture their activity. In other words, it is of course true that mathematicians spend lots of time proving theorems, but at the same time they also spend lots of time preparing the ground, if (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mathematical naturalism: Origins, guises, and prospects. [REVIEW]Bart Van Kerkhove - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (1-2):5-39.
    During the first half of the twentieth century, mainstream answers to the foundational crisis, mainly triggered by Russell and Gödel, remained largely perfectibilist in nature. Along with a general naturalist wave in the philosophy of science, during the second half of that century, this idealist picture was finally challenged and traded in for more realist ones. Next to the necessary preliminaries, the present paper proposes a structured view of various philosophical accounts of mathematics indebted to this general idea, laying the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Pi on Earth, or Mathematics in the Real World.Bart Van Kerkhove & Jean Paul Van Bendegem - 2008 - Erkenntnis 68 (3):421-435.
    We explore aspects of an experimental approach to mathematical proof, most notably number crunching, or the verification of subsequent particular cases of universal propositions. Since the rise of the computer age, this technique has indeed conquered practice, although it implies the abandonment of the ideal of absolute certainty. It seems that also in mathematical research, the qualitative criterion of effectiveness, i.e. to reach one’s goals, gets increasingly balanced against the quantitative one of efficiency, i.e. to minimize one’s means/ends ratio. Our (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Thought Experiments in Mathematics: Anything but Proof.Jean Paul van Bendegem - 2003 - Philosophica 72 (2):9-33.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations