Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The State of the UBI Debate: Mapping the Arguments for and against UBI.Lukáš Siegel, Marius S. Ostrowski, Viktoriia Muliavka & Dominic Afscharian - 2022 - Basic Income Studies 17 (2):213-237.
    This article provides a map of the UBI debate, structured into the main themes that guide and group the arguments on both sides. It finds that UBI’s supporters and opponents both draw on core principles of justice and freedom, focusing on need and poverty, discrimination and inequality, growth, social opportunity, individuality, and self-development. From an economic perspective, they both appeal to business concerns about efficiency, risk, flexibility, and consumption, as well as labour interests on work fulfilment, working conditions, remuneration, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A reply to my critics.Richard Bellamy - 2022 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (4):624-635.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • EU immigration, Welfare Rights and Populism: A Normative Appraisal of Welfare Populism.Dimitrios E. Efthymiou - 2020 - Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric 12 (2):161-188.
    Populists in the EU often call for restrictions on EU immigrants’ access to welfare rights. These calls are often demagogic and parochial. This paper aims to show what exactly is both distinct and problematic with these populist calls from a normative point of view while not necessarily reducible to demagogy and parochialism. The overall aim of the paper is not to argue that all populists call for such restrictions nor to claim that all calls for such restrictions are populist. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The EU 's role in income redistribution and insurance: Support, norm‐setter or provider? A review of justice‐based arguments.Frank Vandenbroucke - 2022 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):471-487.
    Income redistribution and insurance are core functions of welfare states. What role should the EU play in this domain? I examine the purchase of normative theorizing on social justice on this question, focusing on the contrast between three models of EU involvement: the EU as Support, which implies the sharing of resources through intergovernmental transfers; the EU as Provider, which implies EU cross‐border transfers towards individual citizens; the EU as Norm‐setter, which implies that the EU formulates normative policy ideals. I (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • EU Citizens’ Access to Welfare Rights: How (not) to Think About Unreasonable Burdens?Dimitrios E. Efthymiou - 2022 - Res Publica 28 (4):613-633.
    Defenders of current restrictions on EU immigrants’ access to welfare rights in host member states often invoke a principle of reciprocity among member states to justify these policies. The argument is that membership of a system of social cooperation triggers duties of reciprocity characteristic of welfare rights. Newly arriving EU immigrants who look for work do not meet the relevant criteria of membership, the argument goes, because they have not yet contributed enough to qualify as members on the grounds of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Solidarity under duress: Defending state vigilantism.Juri Viehoff - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):546-564.
    European Journal of Philosophy, Volume 30, Issue 2, Page 546-564, June 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • From surplus fairness to prospect fairness: Why a deeply egalitarian social union is indispensable for a free Europe.Eszter Kollar - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):503-514.
    European Journal of Philosophy, Volume 30, Issue 2, Page 503-514, June 2022.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark