Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Within- versus between-country differences in risk attitudes: implications for cultural comparisons.Ferdinand M. Vieider, Thorsten Chmura, Tyler Fisher, Takao Kusakawa, Peter Martinsson, Frauke Mattison Thompson & Adewara Sunday - 2015 - Theory and Decision 78 (2):209-218.
    Cultural comparisons enjoy increasing popularity in economics. Since cultural comparison must abandon random allocation to treatments, it is unclear whether differences found between countries can be attributed to country characteristics or are merely driven by differences in subject pools. In experiments in two Chinese cities and at two campuses in Ethiopia, we show that within-country differences are negligible. Differences between the two countries, on the other hand, are large.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Probability weighting for losses and for gains among smallholder farmers in Uganda.Arjan Verschoor & Ben D’Exelle - 2020 - Theory and Decision 92 (1):223-258.
    Probability weighting is a marked feature of decision-making under risk. For poor people in rural areas of developing countries, how probabilities are evaluated matters for livelihoods decisions, especially the probabilities associated with losses. Previous studies of risky choice among poor people in developing countries seldom consider losses and do not offer a refined tracking of the probability-weighting function. We investigate probability weighting among smallholder farmers in Uganda, separately for losses and for gains, using a method that allows refined tracking of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory. [REVIEW]Ernst-Jan de Bruijn & Gerrit Antonides - 2021 - Theory and Decision 92 (1):5-37.
    Poverty is associated with a wide range of counterproductive economic behaviors. Scarcity theory proposes that poverty itself induces a scarcity mindset, which subsequently forces the poor into suboptimal decisions and behaviors. The purpose of our work is to provide an integrated, up-to-date, critical review of this theory. To this end, we reviewed the empirical evidence for three fundamental propositions: Poverty leads to attentional focus and neglect causing overborrowing, poverty induces trade-off thinking resulting in more consistent consumption decisions, and poverty reduces (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations