Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Notas sobre a atualidade do republicanismo de maquiavel entre duas matrizes teóricas da democracia.Bruno Santos Alexandre - 2015 - Cadernos Espinosanos 32:199.
    Trata-se, neste trabalho, de refletir acerca da recuperação do republicanismo de Nicolau Maquiavel para o debate democrático contemporâneo. Com esse intento, entre as muitas atualizações possíveis do pensamento do secretário florentino para os dias atuais, destaco duas matrizes conceituais, justamente aquelas mais concernidas com as noções de liberdade e ação política popular. Seguindo as sugestões de Helton Adverse, procuro então aprofundar e esclarecer a sua proposta de uma matriz “institucional” e uma matriz “conflitiva” quando da interpretação e recuperação das ideias (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • American caudillo: Princely performative populism and democracy in the Americas.Diego von Vacano - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (4):413-428.
    Populism is on the rise throughout the world and it poses a challenge to democratic theory. Conventional political thought has not dealt seriously with this challenge throughout most of its history. The article takes the challenge seriously, underscoring the rise of Donald Trump as an example of populism. I argue that dominant paradigms in the study of the history of political thought and in normative, Rawlsian approaches do not elucidate populism. I argue that we need to look beyond the mainstream (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Machiavelli’s legacy: The Prince after 500 years.Mauricio Suchowlansky - 2017 - Contemporary Political Theory 16 (2):286-289.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Niccolò Machiavelli.Cary Nederman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Between Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes: A study of modern liberalism from Leo Strauss' thought. [Spanish].José Daniel Parra Quintero - 2010 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 12:48-86.
    Normal 0 21 false false false ES-CO X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} This essay presents a reading of modern liberalism from Leo Strauss´thought. Starting with his analysis of Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Political and its critique of liberal “neutralization and depolitization”, Strauss posits an affirmation of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Entre Carl Schmitt y Thomas Hobbes.: Un estudio del liberalismo moderno a partir del pensamiento de Leo Strauss.José Daniel Parra - 2010 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 12:47-87.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark