Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Board Faultlines and Corporate Innovation Strategies Under the Influence of Property Rights Background and Institutional Environment.Yan Zhang & Lianfu Ma - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:857886.
    This study takes the Chinese technology-intensive listed companies from 2009 to 2019 as the research sample to study the relationship between board faultlines and innovation strategy decisions of companies, and examines the impact of property rights background and institutional environment on the above relationship from the perspective of external governance environment of Chinese-listed companies. The results show that social-related faultlines of the board of directors have a negative influence on corporate innovation strategy decisions; cognitive-related faultlines have a positive effect on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Board Faultlines, Innovation Strategy Decisions, and Faultline Activation: Research on Technology-Intensive Enterprises in Chinese A-Share Companies.Yan Zhang & Lianfu Ma - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13:855610.
    In the context of social norms, based on faultline theory, using samples of Chinese A-share listed companies of technology-intensive industries from 2009 to 2015, this paper studies how board faultlines influence innovation strategy decisions and test the influences of a dual chairman/CEO and board ownership on that relationship. The results of the study are as follows. Social-related faultlines have a significant negative influence on innovation strategy decisions. Cognitive-related faultlines have a significant positive influence on innovation strategy decisions. A dual chairman/CEO (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Making Policies about Emerging Technologies.Gregory E. Kaebnick & Michael K. Gusmano - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S1):2-11.
    Can we make wise policy decisions about still‐emerging technologies—decisions that are grounded in facts yet anticipate unknowns and promote the public's preferences and values? There is a widespread feeling that we should try. There also seems to be widespread agreement that the central element in wise decisions is the assessment of benefits and costs, understood as a process that consists, at least in part, in measuring, tallying, and comparing how different outcomes would affect the public interest. But how benefits and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations