Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Realistic Idealism and Classical Liberalism: Evaluating Free Market Fairness.Mark Pennington - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (3):375-407.
    In Free Market Fairness, John Tomasi defends classical-liberal principles not because of real-world considerations but on ideal-theoretic grounds. However, what constitutes a sufficiently “ideal” ideal theory is debatable since, as Tomasi shows, regimes that range from laissez faire to heavily interventionist can all be classified as legitimate from the perspective of ideal theory. Conversely, if ideal theory can allow for realistic constraints, as Rawls does, then we should recognize that even under ideal-theoretic conditions, political actors face logistical, epistemic, and motivational (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit.Mark Pennington - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):159-184.
    Over recent years support for deliberative democracy as a regulative ideal against which political and economic institutions should be judged has become the dominant tradition within political theory. Deliberative democrats such as Amy Guttman and Dennis Thompson argue that deliberative public decision making would bring with it important epistemological and ethical gains. Closer inspection of these claims, however, suggests that deliberative democratic arrangements are not only impractical but are fundamentally at odds with the epistemic and ethical goals that their supporters (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Democracy and the deliberative conceit.Mark Pennington - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):159-184.
    Over recent years support for deliberative democracy as a regulative ideal against which political and economic institutions should be judged has become the dominant tradition within political theory. Deliberative democrats such as Amy Guttman and Dennis Thompson argue that deliberative public decision making would bring with it important epistemological and ethical gains. Closer inspection of these claims, however, suggests that deliberative democratic arrangements are not only impractical but are fundamentally at odds with the epistemic and ethical goals that their supporters (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Monetary Policy, Credit Extension, and Housing Bubbles: 2008 and 1929.Steven Gjerstad & Vernon L. Smith - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (2-3):269-300.
    ABSTRACT Asset‐market bubbles occur dependably in laboratory experiments and almost as reliably throughout economic history—yet they do not usually bring the global economy to its knees. The Crash of 2008 was caused by the bursting of a housing bubble of unusual size that was fed by a massive expansion of mortgage credit—facilitated, in turn, by the longest sustained expansionary monetary policy of the past half century. Much of this mortgage credit was extended to people with little net wealth who made (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The illusion of regulatory competence.Slavisa Tasic - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (4):423-436.
    ABSTRACT The illusion of explanatory depth, which has been identified by cognitive psychologists, may play a prominent role in encouraging regulatory action. This special type of overconfidence would logically lead regulators to believe that they are aware of the relevant causes and consequences of the activities they might regulate, and of the unintended side effects of the regulatory actions they are contemplating. So, as with other cognitive biases, the illusion of explanatory depth is likely to lead to mistakes. And unlike (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A Crisis of Politics, Not Economics: Complexity, Ignorance, and Policy Failure.Jeffrey Friedman - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (2-3):127-183.
    ABSTRACT The financial crisis was caused by the complex, constantly growing web of regulations designed to constrain and redirect modern capitalism. This complexity made investors, bankers, and perhaps regulators themselves ignorant of regulations promulgated across decades and in different “fields” of regulation. These regulations interacted with each other to foster the issuance and securitization of subprime mortgages; their rating as AA or AAA; and previously their concentration on the balance sheets (and off the balance sheets) of many commercial and investment (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Corporate Governance as Part of the Strategic Process: Rethinking the Role of the Board. [REVIEW]David Weitzner & Theo Peridis - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):33-42.
    Managers are most likely to turn to the board of directors for guidance during a period of crisis. But can good corporate governance prevent an organization from reaching that critical point in the first place? In light of the recent global financial crisis, this question has become all the more pressing, and so to prevent future crises, we argue that corporate boards of directors need to be keenly aware of the potential social harms that might arise from the value-creating activities (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations