Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. “Paid to Endure”: Paid Research Participation, Passivity, and the Goods of Work.Erik Malmqvist - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):11-20.
    A growing literature documents the existence of individuals who make a living by participating in phase I clinical trials for money. Several scholars have noted that the concerns about risks, consent, and exploitation raised by this phenomenon apply to many (other) jobs, too, and therefore proposed improving subject protections by regulating phase I trial participation as work. This article contributes to the debate over this proposal by exploring a largely neglected worry. Unlike most (other) workers, subjects are not paid to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Paying for Fairness? Incentives and Fair Subject Selection.Douglas MacKay & Rebecca L. Walker - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):35-37.
    In their Target Article, “Promoting Ethical Payment in Human Infection Challenge Studies,” Lynch et al. propose a framework for ethical payment to research participants and apply it to the c...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Continued Complexities of Paying Research Participants.Christine Grady - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (9):5-7.
    Volume 19, Issue 9, September 2019, Page 5-7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Precarity, clinical labour and graduation from Ebola clinical research in West Africa.Arsenii Alenichev & Vinh-Kim Nguyen - 2019 - Global Bioethics 30 (1):1-18.
    ABSTRACTThe provision of gifts and payments for healthy volunteer subjects remains an important topic in global health research ethics. This paper provides empirical insights into theoretical debat...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Philosophy Through a Wide-Angle Lens.Janet Malek - 2018 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (1):1-7.
    Philosophers who specialize in bioethics face a distinctive set of challenges in our work: to bring the theoretical insights of philosophical work and methodology to practical dilemmas affecting a diverse group of stakeholders every day. This article describes some of the key contributions that philosophy can make to the field of bioethics. It also identifies some of the pitfalls that can undermine the value of a philosophical approach when used to analyze questions arising in the real world. Recognition of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns.Lindsay Wiley, Mattison Cheek, Emily LaFar, Xiaolu Ma, Justin Sekowski, Nikki Tanguturi & Ana Iltis - forthcoming - HEC Forum:1-37.
    The possibility of editing the genomes of human embryos has generated significant discussion and interest as a matter of science and ethics. While it holds significant promise to prevent or treat disease, research on and potential clinical applications of human embryo editing also raise ethical, regulatory, and safety concerns. This systematic review included 223 publications to identify the ethical arguments, reasons, and concerns that have been offered for and against the editing of human embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 technology. We identified six (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Best to Exclude but Pay.Marion Danis, Sam Doernberg, Matthew Memoli & Joseph Millum - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):87-88.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mutual Obligations in Research and Withholding Payment From Deceptive Participants.Holly Fernandez Lynch, Luke Gelinas & Emily A. Largent - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):85-87.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark